For All Vehicle Claims
 
Potential Systemic Under-Recording of Stolen Vehicles

Potential Systemic Under-Recording of Stolen Vehicles

Until an allegation of vehicle theft is ‘confirmed‘, the LoS (lost or stolen) marker on the PNC (police national computer) will not be conveyed to the DVLA; they will be unaware of the ‘reported stolen’ status.

If the allegation of vehicle theft is not ‘confirmed‘ within 6 weeks, the LoS marker will be ‘weeded‘; automatically removed from the PNC LoS register.

As of day 43, neither the DVLA nor the PNC will record the vehicle LoS.


Request for Authoritative Determination

public.enquiries@homeoffice.gov.uk &
crimeandpolicestats@homeoffice.gov.uk

I enclose an analytical paper examining the apparent discrepancy between police-recorded vehicle theft figures and DVLA stolen-vehicle notifications, and the role that automated deletion (“weeding”) of unconfirmed PNC Lost/Stolen markers may play in that discrepancy.

The paper does not assert causation as a matter of fact. It demonstrates, however, that the scale of the anomaly is such that it requires authoritative determination by a competent national authority, most appropriately the Home Office.

If automated deletion is a material driver, the implications extend to the integrity of published vehicle theft statistics, victim protection, and downstream reliance on DVLA data by insurers, finance providers, and the public.

I would welcome confirmation as to whether the Home Office intends to assess this issue, and if so, how such a determination might be progressed with NPCC and DVLA involvement.


The paper can be read here