{"id":2165,"date":"2023-03-07T12:52:19","date_gmt":"2023-03-07T12:52:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cmaclaims.co.uk\/?page_id=2165"},"modified":"2023-03-20T08:07:22","modified_gmt":"2023-03-20T08:07:22","slug":"cma-are-wrong-not-to-date","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cmaclaims.co.uk\/cma-are-wrong-not-to-date\/","title":{"rendered":"CMA Are Wrong \u2013 not to date!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Having advised an insured\/victim that their vehicle is no longer on the PNC LoS register, we ask them to contact the police to ascertain the vehicle’s whereabouts, conditions and whether it has been recovered.<\/p>\n

Often the insured first returns to us to query our statement, to question whether we are correct because the police have not informed them their vehicle has been found.\u00a0 After all, it is only reasonable to expect the police, to whom the crime was reported, who recorded the event and seemingly have removed their interest from the PNC, to be the party informing a victim they have found the vehicle.\u00a0 We reiterate what we have discovered; the LoS marker is no longer recorded against the VRM we have checked.<\/p>\n

The insured is asked to approach the police as many constabularies are reluctant to speak with us ‘third-parties’ unless we are prepared to abide by an agreement that requires the payment of a fee and to wait weeks or months for a formal response!<\/p>\n

However, all too frequently an insured returns to us after speaking with the police to advise ‘the vehicle has not been found’\u00a0 according to the police, it is still registered as stolen, we (CMA) have erred.<\/p>\n